Inter Milan’s Double Controversies Explained: €27M Investment and Penalty Kicker Concerns Unfounded

In 2024, Inter Milan achieved an impressive ten-game winning streak, leading to an unprecedented scenario in Serie A: Inter’s goal difference of +51 exceeded the total goals scored by any other team in the league. Despite this stellar performance, professional critics remain unsatisfied. Recently, Italian media have been buzzing with two major controversies surrounding Inter Milan. Here’s an in-depth analysis of these issues.

Controversy One: Frattesi’s €27 Million Purchase Option Activation

Davide Frattesi’s acquisition has been under intense scrutiny. Initially, Frattesi joined Inter with a loan deal including a €27 million buyout clause. His transfer was valued at €44 million, including a €6 million loan fee (offset by a deal involving Mulattieri), a €27 million buyout clause (activated under certain conditions), and a €5 million bonus (partially activated if Inter wins their second star). Additionally, there’s a 10% sell-on clause, which media sources estimate will cost Inter another €6 million.

The controversy erupted when Frattesi made his first start for Inter against Lecce, triggering the €27 million buyout clause as per the agreement. Critics argue that this investment is excessive for a player considered a backup, especially given Inter's significant revenue from last season’s Champions League run (around €386 million). Some experts believe that Inter could have avoided this cost by limiting Frattesi's starts and reconsidering the purchase at the season’s end, a strategy previously seen in Serie A.

However, Inter chose to honor the deal, influenced by several factors. Firstly, the Frattesi deal is tied to Sassuolo’s €20 million purchase of Pinamonti, with both transactions structured over extended payment periods, easing Inter’s cash flow burden. Secondly, declaring Frattesi unworthy of a starting spot under Inzaghi is premature. Although Frattesi currently struggles with ball control, making him less compatible with Inter's technically proficient midfield, his long-term potential cannot be ignored.

Frattesi’s Current Role and Future Potential

Critics claim that Frattesi’s lack of technical proficiency will prevent him from displacing Inter’s established midfield trio. However, three key variables suggest otherwise. Firstly, Henrikh Mkhitaryan, one of Inter’s key midfielders, is 35 years old. History has shown that players at this age can experience sudden declines in performance, as evidenced by recent cases with Vidal and Kolarov. Secondly, the restructured formats of the Champions League and other competitions will increase the number of matches, providing ample opportunities for rotation players like Frattesi. Despite being a substitute, Frattesi has impressive goal and assist statistics, making him a valuable asset for the national team, as demonstrated by his rapport with coach Spalletti.

Most importantly, at 24, Frattesi is far from a finished product. It’s unrealistic to pigeonhole him as a one-dimensional player. Many current midfield stars, including Çalhanoğlu and Mkhitaryan, transitioned to deeper roles later in their careers, flourishing under different tactical setups. In a recent interview, Frattesi expressed his commitment to improving his game, citing Barella as an example of adapting and excelling in various midfield roles. Frattesi’s drive and determination to enhance his ball control skills could see him evolve into a more integral part of Inter’s midfield.

Frattesi’s Passion and Drive

Frattesi’s passion and energy are vital qualities for Inter. He spoke about the intense emotions he feels playing at Meazza and his willingness to push through challenges, inspired by the support of Inter fans. This fighting spirit is essential for a team looking to sustain success across multiple fronts. Reflecting on last season’s struggles, where Inter’s attacking options were limited and results were inconsistent, Frattesi’s goal-scoring ability is a significant asset. His average of a goal or assist every 116 minutes is a valuable contribution, offering a much-needed offensive threat from midfield.

Dismissing Frattesi based on his current limitations overlooks the broader context of his potential growth and impact. With Mkhitaryan’s age, increased match demands, and Frattesi’s youthful vigor, Inter’s investment in him could prove to be a strategic masterstroke.

Controversy Two: Lautaro’s Penalty Kicking Role

The second controversy revolves around Lautaro Martínez and the possibility of him taking over as the primary penalty taker. With 15 goals needed in the final 13 league games to break the single-season scoring record (36 goals), Lautaro has expressed his ambition to give it his best shot. However, doubts about his penalty-taking ability have surfaced, considering his record of missing 7 out of 21 attempts for Inter.

Despite concerns among fans on social media, insiders reassure that this issue is overblown. The coaching staff has a clear plan: focus on securing the championship without making unnecessary changes. If Inter clinches the title early, then the situation might be more flexible. Moreover, Lautaro himself has emphasized that personal records are secondary to team success. He values his role as Inter’s captain above individual accolades, understanding that leading by example and striving for collective glory is paramount.

Team Dynamics and Penalty Decisions

Inter’s designated penalty taker is Çalhanoğlu, who has expressed his willingness to help Lautaro achieve his goals. The team’s unity and shared objectives create a positive atmosphere, reducing the likelihood of internal conflicts over penalty duties. Lautaro’s awareness of his responsibilities as captain further mitigates any potential issues. His focus remains on securing the championship and excelling in the Champions League, goals that align with the team’s priorities.

The current harmony within the squad is a testament to the strong leadership and collaborative spirit fostered by Inzaghi. Concerns about penalty disputes disrupting team dynamics are unfounded. The players’ mutual respect and commitment to Inter’s success ensure that any decisions regarding penalty takers will be handled with the team’s best interests in mind.

Conclusion

Inter Milan’s recent controversies, whether regarding Frattesi’s buyout clause or Lautaro’s penalty-taking role, are not as problematic as some critics suggest. Frattesi’s potential to develop into a key player and the team’s cohesive approach to penalty decisions reflect a well-managed and forward-thinking club. As Inter continues to perform at an elite level, maintaining focus on collective goals and nurturing individual talent will be crucial. The team’s success and unity are testaments to their strategic planning and strong leadership, setting the stage for continued achievements in the seasons to come.